Monthly Archives: September 2008

A pig model of cystic fibrosis

Cystic fibrosis is one of the most commonly inherited diseases, affecting about one in every four thousand children born in the USA, and is caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. The CFTR gene produces a channel that allows the transport of chloride ions across membranes in the body, and the many mutations identified in cystic fibrosis sufferers either reduce the activity of the channel or eliminate it entirely. This defect in chloride ion transport leads to defects in several major organs including the lungs, digestive system, pancreas, and liver, though the severity of the disease and the number of organs affected varies considerably among patients.  Over the past few decades the treatment of cystic fibrosis has improved dramatically;  good nutrition, physiotherapy, and the availability of antibiotics to treat the damaging lung infections that are characteristic of the disease have all contributed to an increasing life expectancy among sufferers.  Nevertheless the damage to lungs frequently becomes so severe that cystic fibrosis patients require lung transplants, a procedure made possible through animal research that lead to development of the heart-lung bypass machine and immunosuppressant drugs, and many cystic fibrosis patients still die early in their 20′s and 30′s.

Following the identification of the CFTR gene in 1989 scientists sought to create animal models of cystic fibrosis with which to study the disease, and since the early 1990′s more than a dozen mouse models of cystic fibrosis have been created.  In some of these the CFTR gene has been “knocked out”, in other words completely removed, but in others the mutations found in human cystic fibrosis that result in a defective channel have been introduced.  These mouse models show many of the defects seen in human cystic fibrosis patients and over the past few years have yielded important new information about cystic fibrosis. An example is the discovery that much of the increase in mucus in the airways and impaired ability to clear bacteria is due to a decrease in the volume of liquid on the airway surface (1), which lead to an increased interest in the use of hypertonic saline therapy to help clear the airways.  Recently scientists have been attempting to cure the underlying defects in the CFTR gene through a variety of means, an effort that has been greatly aided by the availability of mouse models. New approaches evaluated in CF mice prior to human trials include gene therapy to replace the defective CFTR gene with a functioning copy, and novel drugs such as PTC124 that masks the mutation and allows the defective CFTR gene to function normally (2).

While mouse models of cystic fibrosis have proven very useful they are far from perfect; none of the mouse models reproduces all the damaged organs seen in human patients. In all but two of the cystic fibrosis mouse models the lung disease only developed after the mice were infected with bacteria such as P.aeruginosa that are associated with cystic fibrosis lung disease in humans, though to what extent development of cystic fibrosis lung disease in humans is dependent on infection by bacteria is still under debate as it is almost impossible to get suitable tissue samples early enough in the course of the disease (3). A particular problem with mice is that their short life span means that they may not have time to develop all the problems seen in the human disease, while the structure of the mouse lung differs from that of humans due to their small size. Due to these problems scientists have sought to create an animal model of cystic fibrosis that more closely matches the human disease.

This week a paper on the journal Science reports the creation of a pig model of cystic fibrosis (4) which shows all the abnormalities that would be expected in a human cystic fibrosis patient of a similar age. The scientists observed that the intestine, pancreas and liver of the newborn pigs showed the same defects seen in many human patients and that there was no evidence of lung defects, which agreed with the fact that the human cystic fibrosis lung disease does not appear until several months or even years after birth.  It will be interesting to see how long it takes for the lung defects to become apparent in the pig, and perhaps even answer the question as to whether or not the initial development of the lung disease requires bacterial infection. Such discoveries may well help to improve therapies that seek to delay onset of the lung disease or to treat it later.  Of course if the pig cystic fibrosis model is as good as it appears to be it will also prove extremely valuable for the evaluation of new drugs and gene therapy approaches to treating the cause of the disease.

An important fact to note is that the cystic fibrosis pigs created in this study are a knockout model, that is a pig where no CFTR chloride ion channel is present, and therefor reproduces the most extreme form of the human disease.  I’d like to see the development of models for the less severe forms of cystic fibrosis, such as the F508 deleted mutation that produces a defective but still slightly active channel and is responsible for about two-thirds of cystic fibrosis cases.  Several approaches for the treatment of cystic fibrosis seek to “fix” the defective channel, and a pig model where these approaches could be studied would be very useful.  This is a small quibble though, and shouldn’t take away from the fine achievement of Christopher Rogers and colleagues.

Addendum April 2010: A follow up paper in Science Translational Medicine has confirmed that within a few months of birth the cystic fibrosis pigs do develop the lung disease seen in humans with cystic fibrosis (5). Already studies of these pigs have provided strong evidence to support the theory that impaired clearence of bacteria from the lungs is a critical event in triggering the inflammation and mucus accumulation typical of cystic fibrosis.  In future expect these cystic fibrosis pigs to play an important role in the evaluation of novel CF therapies.

Regards,
Paul Browne
1) Tarran R. et al.  ”The CF salt controversy: in vivo observations and therapeutic approaches.” Molecular Cell. Volume 8(1), pages149-158 (2001). 

2) Du M. et al. “PTC124 is an orally bioavailable compound that promotes suppression of the human CFTR-G542X nonsense allele in a CF mouse model ”  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Volume 105(6) pages 2064-2069 (2008).

3) Carvalho-Oliveira I et al. “What have we learned from mouse models for cystic fibrosis?” Expert Rev Mol Diagn. Vol. 7(4), pages 407-417 (2007)

4) Rogers C.S. et al. “Disruption of the CFTR Gene Produces a Model of Cystic Fibrosis in Newborn Pigs” Science Volume 321, pages 1837-1841 (2008)

5) Stoltz D.A et al. “Cystic fibrosis pigs develop lung disease and exhibit defective bacterial eradication at birth.”Sci Transl Med. 2010 Apr 28;2(29):29ra31. DOI:10.1126/scitranslmed.3000928

Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals

In a continuing effort to improve the conditions for animals in research, the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) has initiated an update to the 1996 version of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (commonly known as the Guide). The Guide is not only the basis for AAALAC International accreditation, but is also central to the Public Health Service Policy on the Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The Guide’s recommendations carry the force of law based on the Health Research Extension Act passed by Congress in 1985.

The Guide is intended to assist IACUCs, researchers, and veterinarians in fulfilling their obligation to plan, conduct, and oversee animal experiments in accordance with the highest scientific, humane, and ethical principles. The Guide makes recommendations for humane animal care and use based on published data, scientific principles, expert opinion, and experience with methods and practices proven consistent with high-quality, humane animal care and use. It is an important part in the implementation of the 3Rs.

The update effort intends to reflect new scientific information related to the issues already covered in the Guide, and to add discussion and guidance on new topics of laboratory animal care and use related to state-of-the-art animal research programs. Specifically, the committee will review the scientific literature published since the release of the 1996 Guide and determine whether the information currently in the Guide concurs with current scientific evidence. The committee will also review the literature related to new technologies related to laboratory animal care and use and determine where new guidance is necessary to ensure the best scientific outcomes and optimal animal welfare. Three open forums will be held to discuss changes to be made and solicit public opinion.

Regards

Charles

Lasker awards highlight the importance of animal models

Every September the Lasker Foundation announces the names of those scientists who will receive awards for their outstanding contribution to fighting disease, and over time these prestigious awards have gained a reputation as “America’s Nobels.”  Many past awards have been awarded to scientists whose research depended on the use of animals, and this years awards illustrate once again just how important animal models are to both basic and applied medical research.

The 2008 Lasker-DeBakey Clinical Medical Research Award went to  Dr. Akira Endo for his discovery of  statins, a class of drugs that lower the levels of “bad” LDL cholesterol and help to prevent heart attacks and stroke.  When Dr. Endo started his research it was already known that high levels of LDL cholesterol were associated with heart disease, but lowering these levels by dietary modification was difficult since most cholesterol in our bodies is made in our own liver.  An enzyme called HMG-CoA reductase was found to play a key role in the manufacture of LDL cholesterol, so perhaps blocking it’s activity would help lower cholesterol levels.

Dr. Endo knew that  fungi secrete chemicals to kill their competitors, antibiotics to you and me, and screened thousands of fungi for chemicals that could block HMG-CoA reductase activity in vitro.  He identified a fungal product named compactin that could block HMG-CoA reductase activity and then demonstrated that it could inhibit cholesterol synthesis in mice and rats.   Subsequent studies in dogs, rabbits and monkeys demonstrated that blocking HMG-CoA reductase activity and reducing cholesterol synthesis could lower circulating LDL cholesterol levels as had been proposed earlier, and human trials were initiated. Unfortunately just as the first human studies of compactin were being yielding very promising results long-term high dose studies in dogs indicated that the drug was more toxic than it had appeared in earlier studies, and further trials of compactin in humans were halted.  However by this time scientists at Merck research Laboratories had identified a similar molecule named lovastatin which animal studies showed to be effective and without the toxicity of compactin. Following successful human trails lovastatin became the first statin to be approved by the FDA.  Compactin didn’t go away entirely either, the FDA has recently approved a safer modified version of compactin known as pravastatin for lowering cholesterol. Dr Endo’s legacy  is a  whole new class of effective drugs for preventing and treating heart disease.

Basic research is an important part of the overall medical research effort, scientists trying to understand apparently esoteric biological processes often make discoveries that have profound implications for the future of medicine.  This year’s Albert Lasker Basic Medical Research Award to Victor Ambros, David Baulcombe, Gary Ruvkun for their discovery of microRNA is an excellent example of how we can learn about our own biology by studying organisms with whom we appear at first to share little.  Working with the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans and plants they discovered a new mechanism by which living organisms control gene activity. What they found was a novel type of gene that produces an short single-stranded RNA molecule that binds to and tags complementary messenger RNA molecules, marking them for destruction.  Since messenger RNA is required for a gene to produce the protein product that carries out the gene’s function, microRNA effectively reduces or blocks that gene’s activity.

So what does this have to do with medicine? Well the discovery of microRNA provided an explanation for what is happening in a process known as RNA interference (RNAi). RNAi was discovered in 1998 by Andrew Fire and Craig Mello, who found that introducing double stranded RNA sequences that matched the sequence of a gene into a cell could suppress the activity of that gene. This breakthrough won Andrew Fire and Craig Mello the Nobel Prize in 2006 but it was not until the discovery of microRNA that the mechanism by which RNAi works was understood. The work of Ambros, Baulcombe, Ruvken, Fire and Mello has opened up a very exciting new area of biomedical research as RNAi offers a novel way to regulate the function of genes that cause disease, and the first clinical trials are already underway.
Not bad for what the antivivisectionists call “junk science”!

Speaking of Research extends a hearty congratulations to Akira Endo, Victor Ambros, David Baulcombe, and Gary Ruvkun on their awards, their work shows how by studying different living organisms we can make the breakthroughs that lead to new treatments in the clinic.

Cheers
Paul

Your turn to write for SR

I’ve been on holiday for 2 weeks, and thus we can see the updates have been … sparse, to say the least. However we do need more help updating the news part of the website (where this is). If you’re interested in writing any of the following, be it once, monthly, or more, then contact us:

- Animal rights news, what do you think of it! (example)

- A debunk of a recent piece of animal rights misinformation (example)

- A recent breakthrough in science made possible by animal research (example)

Pieces need not be longer than 200-300 words. Science pieces should have a couple of references. If you want to write, but are not sure what about, then email us and we can make a suggestion.

It’s your turn to get involved, so please contact us on: contact@speakingofresearch.org and tell us how you would like to help

Regards

Tom

Changing cellular career paths.

Every year over 13,000 young people are diagnosed with type 1 diabetes, an autoimmune disease where the bodies own defense system turns on the beta cells of the pancreas that produce insulin.  While the development of insulin therapy has enabled many  type I diabetics to live relatively normal lives there is as yet no cure for the disease.  In recent years efforts have been made to restore insulin producing cells to the patients so that they do not need to take insulin.  Transplants of insulin producing cells have had some success in clinical trials but have a huge disadvantage in that the patients need to take immunosuppressive drugs to stop their immune system attacking the “foreign” cells; such drugs have undesirable side effects. Among several approaches being examined to overcome this problem is the use of iPS stem cells which are obtained from the patient themselves, and therefor will not provoke an immune response.  The theory is that these stem cells can be programmed to develop into insulin producing cells and then transplanted back into the patient. While very promising iPS cell research is at an early stage, so it will take a lot of time and research before it can be tried in human patients. In particular there are worries that the very flexibility that allows iPS cells to develop into many cell types might in some circumstances cause cancers.

Inspired by the iPS cell research and the ability of mature cells of animals such as salamanders to change into other cell types during regeneration of injured limbs, Douglas Melton and colleagues at Harvard decided to see if it was possible to reprogram adult cells to become insulin producing cells without going all the way back to stem cells (1). They first screened over a thousand genes that coded for proteins known as transcription factors which regulate the functions of cells to see which are expressed in the developing pancrease, and compared that information to mouse gene knock-out studies to identify nine genes that coded for transcription factors that were important to the development of insulin producing beta cells.  Having identified these genes they needed to know what combination of these genes could convert non insulin producing cells of the fully developed adult  pancreas into insulin producing cells. If such a combination could be identified they also needed to find out if the new insulin producing cells could survive in the pancreas, or would they quickly revert to being non-insulin producing cells.  To do this they used an adenovirus vector which when injected into the mouse pancreas carries new genes into the cells.

With the viral vector they studied several combinations of genes, and after trying several combinations they identified three transcription factor genes which could together turn pancreatic cells into insulin producing cells.  This was despite the fact that the new insulin producing  cells were outside the beta islets where insulin producing cells are normally found. These new insulin producing cells were still present several months after the mice were treated, and when this technique was used on diabetic mice whose pancreatic beta cells had been destroyed it improved their ability to control their blood sugar levels.  They also found that the virus didn’t spread to other tissues, an important observation that suggests the technique will be safe.  Perhaps most importantly they found that the pancreatic cells did not change into stem cells, but instead changed directly from one type of pancreatic cell to another.

This work has obvious implications for the development of cures for type one diabetes, though to be sure there’s a lot of work to be done yet before it can be tried in humans.  However the most important aspect of this research is that it demonstrated for the first time that it is possible to change cell of one type into another type in adult tissue, a discovery that has great implications for the future of regenerative medicine.

Cheers
Paul


1) Zhou Q. et al “In vivo reprogramming of adult pancreatic exocrine cells to bold beta-cells” Nature, published online 27 August 2008, DOI: 10.1038.