Monthly Archives: January 2009

Seeing is Believing

I recently disocvered www.jove.com – that is the Journal for Visualised Experiments. On this website you can see how animal (and non-animal) experiments are carried out with the utmost care and scientific precision. Everything from mice running mazes to invasive neurosurgery are carefully filmed and explained to show correct procedure. From various videos we can see the care is made to ensure animals to do not suffer unnecessarily, and that steps are made to reduce any pain that might be caused – usually down to zero.

Although some experiments may look unpleasent, it would be no different that seeing yourself under the knife during a hospital operation – an event which is painless for most people (due to anaesthetics – a type of drug developed using animal research).

Cheers

Tom

A new era for embryonic stem cells

As the new president takes office and the scientific community eagerly awaits the announcement of the reversal of the ban on federal funding of most research involving human embryonic stem cells (hESC’s), there’s news that the FDA has approved the first ever trial of a treatment based on hESC’s for severe spinal cord injury.

This is a very welcome development; for a decade now hopes have been raised about the potential for hESC’s to treat a range of serious illnesses, particularly brain and spinal injuries,  but despite excellent work by organizations such as the Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation no treatments have yet reached clinical trials in patients.  This is not a criticism of hESC’s, underneath the hype is the reality that hESC research is a very new science. After all the first hESC’s were produced by Professor James Thomson and colleagues at the University of Wisconsin-Madison a mere ten years ago, and a lot of work has been necessary to ensure that hESC therapies are safe and effective enough to justify human trials.

The treatment developed by Geron uses a type of cell known as an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell (OPC) that was derived by growing  hESC’s  under carefully controlled conditions. OPC’s  in their turn develop into oligodendrocytes, cells that forms a sheath around the nerve cells and are vital to the proper function of the nervous system.  In rat studies the scientists at Geron showed that OPC treatment could restore the ability to move after severe spinal injury.  Subsequent safety studies in rodents indicated that the injected cells remained within the nervous system and did not produce teratomas, a type of tumour produced by stem cells that have not been adequately processed to ensure they have differentiated into a more mature cell type suitable for transplantation. An important observation made during Geron’s animal studies of OPC therapy was that the therapy worked when the cells were injected 7 days after injury but not when treatment was delayed until 10 months after injury (1) indication that early treatment was vital, and leading to the decision to treat patients 7-14 days after injury in this phase I clinical trial.

If you take a look through the Geron and Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation websites you will see that there are many other hESC based treatments under development, and appreciate the undeniable importance of animal research to this work. With a new president who appreciates the importance of hESC research we will no doubt see more announcements of this sort, but it’s also worth remembering that animal research is crucial to other types of stem cell research, including the iPS approach we’ve discussed here and other methods we discussed earlier this week on our sister blog in the UK.

Could this be the dawn of a new era in medicine?

Update 21 February 2011: After being put on hold for over a year due to potential problems with cyst formation identified in an animal study, additional animal studies have proved reassuring and the FDA gave its approval for the trial to go ahead. Geron recently announced the enrollment of  the first patient into their phase I study of hESC based therapy for spinal injury.

Regards

Paul Browne

1) Keirstead H.S. et al. “Human embryonic stem cell-derived oligodendrocyte progenitor cell transplants remyelinate and restore locomotion after spinal cord injury” J Neurosci., Volume 25(19), Pages 4694-4705 (2005) doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0311-05.

2005

Sea-kittens?! Truth can be stranger than fiction!

Our friends at PETA have decided that for far too long fish have gotten a bad rap. They have been thought of as slimy, cold and unfeeling creatures that deserve nothing better than to end up impaled on the hook of a blood lusting fisherman. To combat this image, PETA has renamed fish “sea-kittens”. Apparently fresh water fish will have to find their own PR manager. “Sea-kitten” is the perfect name, indeed what child would dare confess that “I have to go home now, my mom’s cooking sea kittens for dinner”.

I for one think the whole idea of renaming much maligned animals is a marvelous idea! Far too many animals have simply been the subject of bad PR and it’s high time this injustice is remedied. Parasites, for instance, have been subjected to an immensely negative campaign. We use the name to describe any number of unsavory groups; children, politicians, investment bankers and parking enforcement officers. But this is unfair. For instance, the fluke Euhaplorchis californiensis can be found in Californian killifish which reduces its ability to avoid predators. This provides feeding egrets with an easy to catch food source and who can claim that’s bad? So the first step is to give much maligned parasites new names. They will now be referred to as “Host Buddies”. But parasites aren’t the only ones to suffer the injustice of bad PR. Spiders (now referred to as “Eight legs o’love”) and Bed Bugs (“Bedtime bity-wities”) have also had their fair share of negative publicity and have thus suffered painful persecution.

The concept of sea-kittens for fish does raise some problems however. If there are now sea-kittens then our feline friends will now have to be reclassified land-kittens to prevent confusion. Pigeons, long thought of as flying rats, could be air-kittens. There are other problems as well. What are we to make of sharks (Headline: “Two fisherman presumed dead after great white sea-kitten attack”)? They are fish though so perhaps sea-cats would work instead. Whales, although not fish, should be OK due to the worldwide attention they receive and the enormous public sympathy their plight generates. Cows however, continue to be viewed as nothing more than a walking meal despite years of PETA’s no meat campaigns. Thus to draw attention to their suffering, cows will become “Land Whales”. How could you hurt a land whale? Haven’t they suffered enough?

While this has all been tongue-in-cheek, it remains fact that PETA has launched this new campaign aimed at children. To many the campaign may seem silly, but think about this; the story has been featured in the Guardian newspaper and was this morning (1-15-09) discussed on the MSNBC morning show Morning Joe. While it may seem over the top it has accomplished one thing; people are talking about it and it’s keeping PETA’s name in the news. While most of us understand PETA is a PR marketing firm there are still many who believe they do good work on behalf of animals and it’s up to us to speak up and set the record straight.

Dave Bienus, Penn State University

Speaking of Research