Monthly Archives: February 2009

A passive defence against the flu?

Influenza is a disease that kills hundreds of thousands of people every year, and periodically causes global pandemics that kill many millions.  There are three major types, A, B and C that can infect humans, although the A is responsible for the most cases and deaths. Within influenza A virus there are two major groups, 1 and 2, each of which includes several subtypes, and finally within each subtype there are many strains. Currently available vaccines can only protect against a narrow range of strains, sometimes only one, and as a consequence every year the World Health Organization (WHO) has to try to predict which strains will cause problems over the following year and make vaccines to protect vulnerable people from them, and naturally they can’t always get the prediction right. More worryingly it takes several months to develop each vaccine so in the event that a new pandemic strain arises a vaccine to protect against it may not become available before it has spread widely. For this reason scientists are working to develop vaccines that will protect against a broad range of influenza strains and subtypes, while at the same time others are developing improved treatments for those who do become infected.

In an exciting paper published online in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (1) a team led by Wayne Marasco of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Robert Liddington of the Burnham Institute for Medical Research, and Ruben Donis of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have used an in vitro screening method to identify human antibodies that bind to a protein called hemagglutinin (the “H” in H5N1) that is found on the surface of the virus and is required for the virus to enter a cell once it has bound to it.  As described in in Nature news the antibodies they identified using an in vitro phage display screening method bind to a portion of hemagglutinin known as the stem that varies little between different subtypes of group 1  influenza A virus and stop the virus entering the cell. Having proved that the antibodies could block virus entry into cells in vitro the scientists then tested if clinically realistic doses of antibody could protect animals from an otherwise lethal influenza A infection. They found that when these antibodies were given to mice that had previously been infected with highly pathogenic strains of the H5N1 and H1N1 virus subtypes the mice remained healthy and the spread of the virus through their organs greatly reduced, while mice that were not given the antibodies died. While H5N1 and H1N1 are both group 1 subtypes of  influenza A currently available vaccines against one do not protect against the other, so this result taken with the in vitro data demonstrated that the antibodies provide broad protection against group 1 influenza A viruses.  This protection was even observed when the antibodies were given 3 days after infection, indicating that these antibodies are suitable for a passive immunization approach to the treatment of influenza following infection, which would be a very valuable addition to the limited range of treatments currently available. Their research also indicated that their screening technique can be used to identify antibodies that can be used to protect against other groups of influenza virus.

But what of “classic” vaccines that stop people acquiring the flu in the first place? Well, the authors of this study suggests that by designing vaccines that direct the immune system to target the conserved stem region of hemagglutinin, rather than the more variable portions of hemagglutinin as is now the case, it may be possible to have vaccines that confer protection against a broad range of influenza subtypes. A combination of only a few such vaccines could yield a “universal” flu vaccine, which is certainly an exciting prospect, though since flu is also found in many wild and domesticated animal populations which can transmit it to us we will probably never be possible to control it as thoroughly we have controlled polio.

Regards

Paul Browne
1) Sui J. et al “Structural and functional bases for broad-spectrum neutralization of avian and human influenza A viruses” Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. Advanced Online Publication , 22 February 2009, doi:10.1038/nsmb.1566

Animal Research – Your Voices Heard!

I was recently contacted by a PhD student who was studying at the University of British Columbia (Canada). She is running a survey on people’s views and reactions to animal research. So help a poor student out and show where out views on animal research are!

Dear Reader

Our group at UBC has created an online, interactive survey to better understand attitudes towards the use of animals in research. We would like to include the perspectives of Speaking of Research readers because they represent important perspectives on the use of animals in research.

The survey consists of 2-5 questions and will take approximately 5-10 minutes of your time.

In order to take the survey you will need to register. This requires entering your email address. Please don’t be put off, this is simply so that we can make the survey safe from spammers and hackers. We will not be able to link your e-mail address with your answers, and we will not give your details to any third party.

If you have any questions about the research, please feel free to e mail me at
eormandy [at] interchange.ubc.ca

You can access the ‘Animals in Research: Responsible Conduct’ survey via this link:
http://www.yourviews.ubc.ca/en/animalsinresearch

Our homepage also has links to other really interesting surveys regarding ethical issues so once you’ve completed our survey, feel free to take others!

Thank you. We value your input.

Elisabeth

Shedding some light on the dark side of stem cells

In recent weeks we have discussed the potential of stem cells in developing new therapies, but stem cells also have a more sinister side.  Over the past decade scientists have become increasingly interested in the possibility that in many, perhaps most, cancers there is a small population of cells that are the only tumour cells with the capacity for limitless self-renewal, and that to completely cancer from a patient treatments must target these cancer stem cells (CSCs).  Until now it has not been clear how the gene disruptions seen in cancer cells relate to their potential to become cancer stem cells, and how the disrupted gene alters cellular signaling pathways to turn the cells into CSCs.

The BBC reports an exciting development at Stanford University where scientists have discovered that CSCs in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), known as leukemia stem cells (LSCs) bear a striking similarity to embryonic stem cells. To make this discovery the scientists led by Dr Tim Somervaille (1) used a mouse model of AML where the mice were injected with hematopoietic stem cells which had been modified by using a retroviral vector to add a mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL) gene whose activity had been altered by fusion with another gene. MLL is an important regulator of gene function in normal development but when it acts abnormally, for example after a mutation fuses it to another gene, it is associated with leukemia, including some cases of human AML.  Dr Somervaille found that the number of LSCs found in the spleen and bone marrow of mice that were injected with cells that had been transformed using the MLL-ENL and MLL-AF9 fusion genes was greater than that found in mice that were injected with cells that had been transformed with other MLL fusion genes. Microarray analysis showed that the LSCs produced by MLL-ENL and MLL-AF9 strongly expressed genes that were characteristic of embryonic stem cells and a poor prognosis in the clinic, whereas these genes were not expressed strongly in cells transformed by MLL fusion genes that did not give rise to high numbers of LSCs. They obtained further evidence to support the role of genes of the embryonic stem cell program by demonstrating that when the action of these genes was blocked the number of LSCs that MLL-ENL cells could produce was greatly reduced.

This work indicates that the prognosis for AML patients may depend on the number of LSCs and on the extent to which a gene disruption such as the MLL fusion genes subverts the normal self-renewal program in hematopoietic so that it resembles that of embryonic stem cells. This is exciting since it was previously believed that the LSCs were thought to be similar to normal hematopoietic stem cells, the adult stem cells that are needed to produce blood cells, and the observation that they are in fact more similar to embryonic stem cells may allow the development of chemotherapy that targets the LSCs while sparing the blood cell producing cells. This is a piece of basic research that helps to explain previous clinical observations and may well influence the design of new cancer therapies for years to come.

Regards

Paul Browne

1) Somervaille T.C.P. et al. “Hierarchical Maintenance of MLL Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells Employs a Transcriptional Program Shared with Embryonic Rather Than Adult Stem Cells” Cell Stem Cell, Volume 4, Pages 129-140 (2009) doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.11.015

Trinity College, Dublin, debates animal research

On Wednesday I travelled in Dublin to participate in a debate on animal research at the Historical Society (debating union) at Trinity College Dublin.

The motion debated was “This house believes Trinity has too little respect for nature” – with a strong focus on animal research  reinforced by the two guest speakers, myself and Yvonne Smalley of the Irish Anti-Vivisection Society. Sadly, only a few hours before the debate was due to begin, Smalley pulled out from the debate.

With five speakers per side debate was lively. Approaches from the anti-vivs focused on animal rights, with much of the floor adding their points for and against the concept. See our section on AR beliefs for a deconstruction of the “Animals have Rights” argument. Some common misconceptions on animal welfare were also used – certain people were not aware of strict regulations surrounding animal research, and others believed that cosmetic testing was carried out at Trinity (this is not the  case, and further more all cosmetic testing will be banned in Europe from March 2009).

My own speech covered the many and varied benefits of animal research, the regulations involved in ensuring animal welfare standards, and some of the crucial research going on at Trinity College Dublin, such as their development of a mouse model for Retinal Pigmentosa (a form of Blindness) which looks promising for the development of a future treatment.

Finally the debate came to vote – with a convincing victory for the “nays” over the “ayes”, with a belief that trinity college is committed to crucial medical research carried out in a considerate and respectful manner.

Cheers

Tom

Speaking of Research to debate in Ireland

Tom Holder, Speaking of Research spokesman, is to travel to the oldest student society in the world (founded 1770), the Trinity College Dublin Historical Society (colloquially, “The Hist”), to debate the issue “This house belives that Trinity has too little respect for Nature“. Holder will oppose a speaker from the Irish Anti-Vivisection Society, as well as sharing the floor with several student speakers on each side.

Animal Research become a hot topic at Trinity College with several groups forming against the activity. Holder recently defended animal research in a student newspaper Op-Ed piece.

Animal research is strictly regulated in both Ireland and the UK, with new projects having to pass ethics committees to ensure that the potential benefit to humans outweighs the cost to the animals involved. Underpinning the high welfare standards are the 3Rs; replacement of animal methods with alternatives wherever possible, reducing the number of animals used, and refining our care for animals by ensuring suitable enrichment activities.

The debate will take place on Wednesday 4th February, at 7:15

htwk5-green-website

Regards

Paul Browne