Monthly Archives: April 2009

Are you Pro-Test? Sign the Petition!!

Join over the hundreds of people (1400+ at time of writing) who have signed The Pro-Test Petition! This is a petition of scientists, students and the general public aims to show the world that the majority do support animal research – and moreover they dare stand up and sign their name to it. On April 22nd around 800 people stood up at UCLA in support of lifesaving medical research – now it’s up to you. Tell your friends, family and colleagues to go to:

www.raisingvoices.net

We the undersigned believe:

  1. That animal research has contributed and continues to contribute to major advances in the length and quality of our lives.  It remains vital to understanding basic biological processes and for the development of new treatments and therapies such as antibiotics, vaccines, organ transplants, and cancer medicines.
  2. That animal research is morally justifiable provided animal welfare remains a high priority and no valid non-animal alternatives are available.
  3. That violence, intimidation and harassment of scientists and others involved in animal research is neither a legitimate means of protest, nor morally justified.
They're Pro-Test, Are You?

They're Pro-Test, Are You?

This petition is a joint effort between  Speaking of Research, Americans for Medical Progress, and UCLA Pro-Test. This project was also motivated by the successful People’s Petition in the UK, set up by Coalition for Medical Progress (now called Understanding Animal Research) which gathered well over 20,000 signatures – including then Prime Minister, Tony Blair. In Blair’s letter to the Sunday Telegraph he wrote:

Announcing that I am to add my name to the on-line petition in support of animal testing … is something of a break with tradition – and a sign of just how important I believe it is that as many people as possible stand up against the tiny group of extremists threatening medical research and advances in this country.

With Barack Obama’s desire to increase funding in science, there has never been a better time for politicians to add their name to the Pro-Test Petition. If you do hold a particularly public post, or you a particularly eminent scientist (Nobel Prizes etc.) and you are willing to have your name highlighted in the petition – please contact us after signing.

I’ll finish with a quote from Obama:

At such a difficult moment, there are those who say we cannot afford to invest in science. That support for research is somehow a luxury at a moment defined by necessities. I fundamentally disagree. Science is more essential for our prosperity, our security, our health, our environment, and our quality of life than it has ever been. And if there was ever a day that reminded us of our shared stake in science and research, it’s today.

Never a truer word was spoken.

Cheers

Tom Holder

SR at the Scand-LAS Conference

The day after the UCLA Pro-Test rally I headed to Ystad in Sweden to give a presentation to a conference held by the Scandanavian Society for Lab Animal Science (Scand-LAS). Exhibitors of new and innovative lab animal equipment showed off the latest developments in reduction, replacement and refinement. For example, one firm offered an automatic blood sampling machine which would be hooked up to a mouse by catheter. Precise amount of blood being drawn meant that less mice could be used to attain small amounts of blood, and the mouse was happier since it would not need to be be removed from its cage to have blood drawn – reduction AND refinement. Talks at the conference varied – with talks informing technicians on the best methods of housing and feeding zebrafish, as well as presentations on the latest studies on Cystic Fibrosis.

The meeting did draw a small number of animal rights protesters who came out at 11pm to stand outside and shout slogans. When approached the protesters backed off, unwilling to debate those at the conference. Sadly for the protesters their efforts ended up appearing quite farsical – indeed it seemed odd for them to be protesting an event full of the animal care technicians and veterinarians whose job it is to look after the animals wellbeing.

My presentation – the final of the three day conference – was well received. It had undergone some major alterations on the plane from LA as I included some footage and information about the success of the UCLA Pro-Test rally on April 22nd. Many people seem keen to help write information for Speaking of Research – and all in all the event was fun and interesting!

Cheers

Tom Holder

UCLA Pro-Test – Post-rally Blog Coverage

420_pro-test-ucla-banner-with-data

Well we’ve covered video coverage and print coverage of the Pro-Test rally, now onto the blogs.

Before we get too deep into the UCLA Pro-Test coverage, many of the blogs, including the highly-read Pharyngula blog, have talked about the poll attached to the LA Times article. The poll has (somewhat suspiciously for both sides) attracted over 150,000 votes, with the Pro-Testers currently leading this simplistic dichotomy (see Adventure in Ethics and Science blog on this) by around 60%.  So in the words of PZ Myers “please, go forth and destroy this pointless metric”.

Respectful Insolence wrote a piece reviewing the various media coverage as well as offering his own thoughts:

For too long, animal rights extremists have had the public relations stage virtually to themselves, and this Pro-Test Rally was an excellent demonstration of what scientists can do when they refuse to be cowed. Remember, this is about animal welfare, but not animal rights. Animal welfare. Scientists are very much concerned with animal welfare, and animal research is a highly regulated endeavor.

The Pro-Test March

Nick Anthis’s Scientific Activist blog also wrote a fantastic and comprehensive report of the rally coverage.

By all accounts, yesterday’s UCLA Pro-Test rally in support of animal research was a great success. Up to 800 people showed up for the Pro-Test rally, but only 30-40 people showed up for a concurrent anti-research rally.

Science Journal’s blog (which we mentioned before but was so good I’m mentioning it again) gave some of the best coverage of the issue:

The organizers of today’s Pro-Test rally at the University of California, Los Angeles, say it succeeded beyond their hopes. Hundreds of people—many of them students and postdocs—came out to show their support for biomedical research.

The Pharyngula blog announced “I am Pro-Test”. Drug Monkey mentioned some video coverage among his two posts on the issue, and Neurotopia v. 2.0 showed their excitment about the rally.

So that’s the coverage all wrapped up, if you know of any more leave a comment.

Cheers

Tom

UCLA Pro-Test – Post-rally Print Coverage

420_pro-test-ucla-banner-with-data

Well we covered the video footage from major television networks, now onto the print media (and web coverage).

Just in case you have been living in a box and want happened you can read our comprehensive report here. Also make sure you sign The Pro-Test Petition. Go on, do it now, then come back and read the rest of this… Signed it yet? Good, read on!

To start, NBC Los Angeles News covered the event, explaining the size of the rally:

The Pro-Test demonstrators started to gather across the street. Their numbers grew larger and larger by the minute.The two sides shouted back and forth at each other. It was emotional, but not violent.

As the number of Pro-Test demonstrators grew, the animal-rights protesters quickly disappeared.  The Pro-Test group swelled to 750 people by one estimate. They carried signs that read “Say No To Terror,” “Stop the Bombing,” “Animal Research Cures Cancer” and “Research Benefits Human & Animal Lives.”  The Pro-Test group marched across campus and held a rally in front of the Court of Sciences. The crowd cheered and applauded as researchers talked about the medical advances that have been made, in part, due to animal testing.

Greg Miller from Science Journal posted a fantastic news blog post that covered many interesting points. One interesting interview:

In the crowd I spotted UCLA neuroscientist Dario Ringach, who announced in 2006 that he would give up his animal research if activists would stop harassing him and his family. “I came because I don’t think people should have to face a choice between the security of their family and their research,” he told me later. “I came to defend academic research and academic freedom.”

Miller also produced a longer story for the print version of Science Journal.

LA times produced a positive story, although  the original 300+ word blog article was written and published before the rally had even finished which might explain why their estimated turnout numbers are lower than everyone else’s (including the police estimates).

Jentsch said his rally’s comparatively large turnout showed that many people wanted to speak out against the attacks and for the medical advances that he said animal research produces.
“Look around you and you will see the brightest minds on the West Coast on this street, right now. They are all here to support this cause,” said Jentsch, who recently founded UCLA Pro-Test, which backs what it calls humane, regulated animal research.
Among the marchers was Dana Gant, who carried a placard that read, “Animal Research Saved My Mom,” a reference she said was to new medicines that helped her mother survive breast cancer.

The UCLA student newspaper, the Daily Bruin, ran not one, but two (see what I did there…) front page articles on the Pro-Test rally. These pieces showed a mix of the feeling of the rally and the reasons that researchers consider animal-models so crucial.

Hundreds of people carried signs proclaiming, “Stop the Violence” and “Animal Research Saves Lives.” Many also joined in chants of “No more threats! No more fear! Animal research wanted here!”
Pro-Test supporters filed into the Court of Sciences. Tom Holder, a member of the first Pro-Test group, which was founded at Oxford University in 2006, walked up to the microphone.
“Today is going to be remembered as the day scientists stood up and said ‘No more’ to the fear and harassment of researchers who practice life-saving research,” he said. [Article by Daniel Schonhaut]

Wyeth works with mice in her research on epilepsy – right now, she said, scientists don’t know how seizures start or stop, or how the disorder develops.
By studying mice, her team may be able to figure out the mechanisms of epilepsy. Scientists know people with head trauma are vulnerable to epilepsy – so veterans returning from war are susceptible – but there are no interventions to prevent it yet.
Wyeth said the public generally doesn’t realize how much training researchers undergo before they are even allowed to touch an animal. [Article by Audrey Kuo]

More reports came from the San Franciso Chronicle (AP article), CNN and the UCLA Newsroom.

Check back soon for our report on the blog posts surrouding the event.

Cheers

Tom

UCLA Pro-Test – Post-rally Video Coverage

420_pro-test-ucla-banner-with-data

After the hugely successful UCLA Pro-Test rally (full report) it is time to turn towards the media coverage of the event:

Video:

Fox News covered the event with a news story and video (embedded below – or linked). They compared the motives of the Pro-Testers and the animal rights activists and included a number of short interviews with those marching with UCLA Pro-Test. In the article alongside the video one Pro-Test organizer explained how animal research had affected her:

“I owe science a debt of gratitude for saving my parents’ lives,” she said, explaining that one had survived leukemia and the other cancer because they were treated with chemotherapy developed through research on animals.

more about “Fox News covers Pro-Test Rally“, posted with vodpod

NBC showed a video review (embedded below or link) with footage of the rally and interviews with David Jentsch and John D. Young.

“Moments later an even bigger group of people emerged, calling themselves Pro-Test – this group claimed animal research saves lives”.

The UCLA Newsroom provided some great footage of the rally (see YouTube version below) as well as a fantastic supporting article, which contained a fantasic explanation for the importance of animal research by Dr. Gerald Levey, Dean of the Geffen School of Medicine.

“Animal research has played a crucial role in virtually every medical advance of the last century,” including the discovery and development of antibiotics, analgesics, anti-depressants, organ transplants, heart surgery and more, Levey said. “Many diseases that ravaged the world are now preventable, treatable or have been eradicated all together. Think about it: Immunizations against smallpox, polio, diphtheria, mumps, rubella, influenza and hepatitis have saved millions of lives, and survival rates of breast cancer and leukemia are at an all-time high, thanks to animal research.”

The video contained footage of speeches by Tom Holder, Dr. Gerald Levey and Professor David Jentsch.

KABC-TV (ABC-7) covered the event (UCLA Pro-Test can be seen at 1:15 on), showing Pro-Testers chanting, Tom Holder’s (SR founder) press conference speech, and an interview with UCLA Pro-Test founder, David Jentsch.

Also weighing in were news heavyweights CNN. They sent their cameras to the rally and produced two videos of the event (click “video”). One is a general overview of the days events, while the second shows the energy of the marchers as Speaking of Research founder, Tom Holder, leads the marchers in chants.

CBS2 shows a video of both the animal rights activists and the Pro-Test rally, with interviews on both sides.

Possibly due to fear of reprisal, many Pro-Testers interviewed by news crews declined to give their full name – however most of the interviews were conducted at the start, before the full rally started and hopefully those same people will now be more confident.

Keep an eye out for our next piece when we give a report of the print media news coverage.

Cheers

Tom

UCLA Pro-Test a resounding success

420_pro-test-ucla-banner-with-data

As less than 40 animal rights activists came together to denounce animal researchers a rather bigger crowd began to grow on the other side of the road. Shouting chants like “Stand up for Science! Stand up for Research!” this group, with almost 20 minutes before the scheduled start of the rally, began to grow.

UCLA Pro-Test Animal Research Saves Lives

UCLA Pro-Test Animal Research Saves Lives

One hundred. Two hundred. Four Hundred. By the time we reached our final destination we numbered around 800 people. Making their voices heard, scientists and students marched along Westwood Avenue up to the Court of Sciences in the heart of UCLA.

At the Court of Sciences we heard inspiring words from researchers and administrators alike who added their voices to ours. Professor Lynn Fairbanks spoke of her son (Type I Diabetes) who’s life has been saved by the animal research that went in to developing his treatments. Dr. John D. Young went as far as to say that if there was any use of animals that can be described as vital to humans, it was the use of animals in research.

It was amazing to see the energy run through the crowd – and I thank everyone there for being a part of it. It was also announced that the Californian-based Pro-Test Petition would start accepting names of people who believe in research. Go sign it now.

Professor David Jentsch, Founder of UCLA Pro-Test commented:

The rally at UCLA showed the best side of the researchers and individuals who support biomedical research and forcefully made the case for the benefits of biomedical research conducted on our campus. This is the beginning of a forwards-looking process that we hope will successfully counteract the environment of fear caused by extremist attacks.

David Jentsch at the UCLA Pro-Test rally

David Jentsch at the UCLA Pro-Test rally

Cheers

Tom

Last Call – Join the UCLA Pro-Test rally

Today’s the day! With 70F weather expected there’s no excuse not to march for science, reason and medical progress at the UCLA Pro-Test Rally. Listen to speeches from JohnYoung (AMP Chairman), Scott Waugh (Executive Vice Chancellor of UCLA), Tom Holder (founder of Speaking of Research) and David Jentsch (UCLA Pro-Test founder) among others.

Come to the corner of Westwood and Le Conte for 11:30am today (see parking).

Over 100 people have signed their support for the cause which promises to be a historic event!  The committee has come out into the public., and letters of support have come from all over, including the Society for Neuroscience.

So bring your friends, your family and your colleagues and lets’ make this the day in which California said no to animal rights extremism.

Cheers

Tom Holder

Why are we marching?

At a banner making session today (Monday) I decided to ask a few people why they were planning on attending Wednesday’s rally. Here are a handful of responses I got:

My dad survived leukaemia, my mum survived ovarian cancer, all thanks to chemotherapy – which was developed in animals. Everyone knows at least one person who’s been affected by cancer, and novel treatments need to be developed and require animals for this process.
- Stephanie Groman

I’m going to the rally because I’m tired of no one standing up for us, and letting the animal rights activists walk all over us, when we’re actually benefiting society.
- Sarah Sterlace, MA, UCLA

Without the research we are turning our backs on the thousands of veterans returning home with post-traumatic stress disorder. We work on novel treatments for this disorder using rat models. We treat people who have already been through a serious trauma and it doesn’t seem right that their trauma continues because animal rights activists scare researchers off their work.
- Moriel Zelikowsky, UCLA

Because those who make scientific advances should not have to live in fear.
- Melissa Flesher

As a human researcher I recognize the importance of using animals in research and I’m here to support my colleagues against the deplorable acts of violence that have plagued scientists everywhere. My research directly benefits from the work done by my colleagues who research using animals.
- Fred Sabb, Assistant Professor Psychiatry, UCLA

It’s about time that scientists stand up and speak out in support of biomedical research. I hope students and scientists from all academic departments across UCLA and its neighbouring universities come to support us as we march for the future of medical progress.
- Andrew Poulos

These responses are boosted by scientists from all across the US who have signed their support for UCLA researchers (still time to sign it). So we expect to see you at the junction of Le Conte and Westwood, at the UCLA campus, at 11:30am Wednesday April 22nd 2009 – a day that may change the direction of the animal research debate in the US.

Check out the UCLA Pro-Test page to see the latest updates including speaker lists, directions and schedule.

Cheers

Tom Holder

p.s. Check out the UCLA Pro-Test Facebook group (now well over 500 members) to show your support for medical research, and participate in some healthy debate from the occasional animal rights activist who took a wrong turn on the internet.