Monthly Archives: June 2009

Have your Senator and Congressman signed yet?

Backing up a recent post by DrugMonkey, Speaking of Research is now urging you to write to your Member of Congress (contact my Congress Representative) and Senator (contact my Senator) to request that they sign the Pro-Test Petition.

For example (Pick one of the three coloured paragraphs):

Dear <insert name of your Senator/Member of Congress here>,

I am contacting you to urge to you to sign the Pro-Test Petition which seeks to defend the rights of scientists to use animals in medical research. The petition can be found at www.raisingvoices.net. It states:

We the undersigned believe:

  1. That animal research has contributed and continues to contribute to major advances in the length and quality of our lives.  It remains vital to understanding basic biological processes and for the development of new treatments and therapies such as antibiotics, vaccines, organ transplants, and cancer medicines.
  2. That animal research is morally justifiable provided animal welfare remains a high priority and no valid non-animal alternatives are available.
  3. That violence, intimidation and harassment of scientists and others involved in animal research is neither a legitimate means of protest, nor morally justified.

Animal research has played a part in nearly every major medical advance from penicillin (mice) and insulin (dogs, rabbits, mice) to meningitis vaccines (mice) and anti-retroviral drugs to combat AIDS (mice, monkeys). Scanning techniques, such as MRI and CT, as well as surgical procedures, such as transplants and replacement heart valve surgery, have benefited from knowledge gained through animal studies. It is important that this lifesaving method used in the development of new treatments is not blocked by a small, and often violent, minority.

Animal research is one of the most heavily regulated fields of science, with oversight at both an institutional and national level to ensure animal welfare remains a priority. Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs) ensure all research maintains a high standard of welfare through the application of the 3Rs – the Replacement of animals with non-animal techniques wherever possible, the Refinement of animal welfare through better housing and improved veterinary care, and the Reduction of animal research to an absolute minimum. Given this system we believe animal research can contribute to the treatments of the future while keeping the US as a front runner in animal welfare.

Researchers around the US have been under attack by a small but violent group of animal rights extremists. Arson attacks against the homes and vehicles of scientists is rising, and researchers and their families have been threatened by activists. In the UK in 2006, the then Prime Minister, Tony Blair, signed his name to the People’s Petition in support of lifesaving medical research and against the violent actions of animal rights extremists – this contributed to the swing in the public support for scientists and the important work they do for society as well as broader support for science in general. The Pro-Test Petition aims to replicate the success of its UK counterpart, and to make the public aware of the lifesaving work that researchers in the US carry out on a daily basis.

I urge you to add your signature to almost 12,000 others in supporting the aims and principles of the Pro-Test petition. To learn more about the benefits of animal research please check out www.speakingofresearch.com or www.amprogress.org.

Yours Sincerely,

<insert your name>

I hope the above model email helps – please personalize it wherever you can – the larger the variety of the emails on the same issue, the greater the likelihood of the Senator/Congressman taking action.

Cheers

Tom Holder

ALF run amok worldwide

Despite progress in California with the public beginning to take a stand against animal rights extremism the regular reports from the ALF website should remind us that we have a long way to go. Here is a selection of ALF attacks in the last month.

June 15th 2009 – Bomb hoax at a university in the Netherlands – extremists continue to scare scientists into silence, thus monopolizing the public debate on animal research.

ALF bomb warning June 16th 2009

June 2nd 2009 – Activists in Uruguay perform a fake murder of a researcher.

ON THE EVENING OF TUESDAY, JUNE 2 WE APPROACHED THE INSTITUT PASTEUR AND ON A GATE ON THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING WE TOOK A NOOSE AND HUNG A LIFE-SIZED DOLL DRESSED LIKE THOSE TORTURERS (VIVISECTORS) WITH THE NAME OF MARTINA CRISPO (HEAD OF THE TRANSGENIC AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS UNIT), THEN WE SET FIRE TO TWO TIRES

May 21st 2009 – In the UK activists carry out a smear campaign by falsely accusing two Novartis executives. This tactic has been used before in the UK and shows the disgusting lows that animal rights extremists are willing to go in openly lying to make themselves heard.

100 letters have been delivered to residents of Horsham. The letters, printed on headed Sussex Police paper, and signed from PC Sean McDonald, claimed that the following two Novartis vivisectors are paedophiles.

May 20th 2009 – In Germany a pharmaceutical executive had his life put at risk by two incendiary devices – extremists then threatened further action.

This night we placed incendiary devices under 2 expensive cars locked behind the gate of Ulrich Lehner.

We will only give you two warnings Ulrich, the third time that we will pay a visit someone will get hurt.

May 18th 2009 – It may have seemed that the US had escaped these troubles, but unfortunately not. Four incendiary devices caused an estimated $300,000 worth of damage at a laboratory supplier in Nevada. This is a common tactic by animal rights extremists, to attack secondary and tertiary targets in order to cause financial problems to the main target.

May 18th 2009 - incendiary attack by ALF

These sickening tactics serve to scare the scientific community into silence. However researchers cannot let this happen – they must use any opportunity to get across a simple message: Animal Rights extremism damages the medical research that saves millions of lives around the world – we must not give in to this violent minority. This message is short and simple and media-friendly – we must make all researchers advocates for the cause.

Regards

Tom

UCLA Pro-Test … in 1 minute (YouTube)!

No it’s not the reduced Shakespeare company, it’s the first of a handful of videos which UCLA Pro-Test is producing (with the help of FPS Productions) about the successful rally on April 22nd.

Now for everyone with a YouTube account, we need your help to get this video seen by as many people as possible. So favourite the video, rate it 5*s and then share it with your friends.

UCLA Rally on YouTube

Alternatively you can view it on our website below.

YouTube has been a hugely important tool for organizations to get their messages across, and Speaking of Research is no exception, with our “Why we need animals in research video“. So help us spread the message.

Cheers

Tom

Can we protect the brain against tumor metastasis?

Brain metastasis that affect at least 20% of cancer patients are a serious problem for doctors seeking to treat cancer and kill thousands of patients every year, being particularly difficult to treat because many anti-cancer drugs cannot cross the blood-brain barrier and because surgery to remove the tumor can often be difficult and risky.  Patients suffering from breast, lung and skin cancer run a relatively high risk that their cancer will spread to the brain, a worrying fact considering that these are amongst the most common of cancers .  As a consequence of this scientists are very keen to understand how cancer spreads to the brain, with the ultimate aim of preventing that spread.

It has long been thought that brain metastasis is due to interactions between cells that are shed by the primary tumor and the nerve cells of the brain, but real evidence of this from living animals and humans for that theory has been hard to find, and in recent years observations made in animal models of cancer have suggested that blood vessels in the brain rather than nerve cells are the site of the early growth of tumor cells during brain metastasis.  This week a paper in the open access journal PLoS One reports on work done by scientists at Oxford University that confirms that during brain metastasis tumor cells do indeed bind to blood vessels and form tumors before spreading into the surrounding nerve tissue, a result of huge importance to the future treatment and prevention of brain metastasis.

Brain Metastasis From Lung Cancer

Brain Metastasis From Lung Cancer

To demonstrate this Dr Shawn Carbonel and colleagues (1) injected breast and skin tumor cells into the bloodstream or fat tissue of mice and then after several days humanely killed the mice determined where in the brain the micrometastases, small colonies of tumor cells that later grow into tumors, were forming, and found that almost all were associated with the blood vessels. There was no sign of any new blood vessel growth, which indicated that the metastases were associating with the blood vessels, and that it wasn’t simply the case that they were promoting the growth of new blood vessels in the vicinity of the growing tumor. To confirm that this is also true in humans they examined tissue samples that been donated following neurosurgery or autopsy and found that almost all metastases were associated with blood vessels, a finding that supported the results of their experiments in mice.

Now they had to answer a new question; were the micrometastases associated with the blood vessels because they have a preference for interacting with the cells of the blood vessel, or simply because the first part of the brain they come to is that adjecent to the blood vessel?  To answer this the Oxford scientists injected tumor cells that were labelled with green fluorescent protein directly into an area of the brain allowing equal access to both blood vessels and nerve cells, and using a cranial window in the skulls of the mice were able to observe where the GFP-labelled tumor cells ended up.  They observed that the GLF-labelled cells associated almost exclusively with blood vessels, and that the tumors subsequently grow into the surrounding brain tissue.

The tumor cells bind to a blood vessel structure called the vascular basement membrane (VBM), but what the Oxford scientists really wanted to know was what caused the tumor cells to bind to the VBM. Once again using mice with cranial windows fitted they found that an enzyme named focal adhesion kinase was highly active where the tumor cells were interacting with the VBM. Focal adhesion kinase is part of a pathway through which a  class of proteins known as the integrins control the interaction between many cells and either other cells or extracellular proteins such as the components of the vascular basement membrane, an observation which suggested that an integrin plays a key role in the binding of tumor cells to the VBM. They next found that a particular integren named Beta 1 integrin is present on all the tumor cell lines they were studying, and that antibodies blocking it could prevent the tumor cells from binding components of the VBM in vitro and to blood vessels in human brain tissue slices.

But would the anti-Beta 1 integrin blocking antibody prevent tumor metastasis in living animals? The answer was yes, the antibodies greatly reduced the growth tumors from human breast tumor cells that were injected directly into the brains of mice. To further emphasize the importance of Beta 1 integrin in brain metastasis they found that when mouse lymphoma cells that had been genetically engineered to lack Beta 1 integrin were injected into mouse brains they formed far smaller tumors than non-GM lymphoma cells.
This  study changes the way we look at the process of brain metastasis, and more importantly in Beta 1 integrin it identifies a target for new drugs, perhaps monoclonal antibodies, that block the binding of tumor cells to blood vessels and prevent brain metastasis.  With this in mind it is useful to note that studies in mice have found that while Beta 1 integrin is crucial during embryonic development prolonged anti-Beta 1 therapy in adult animals did not produce any overt evidence of toxicity (2), indicating that it should also be possible to inhibit it safely in human patients during anti-cancer chemotherapy.

It’s a very nice paper, my only gripe being that they didn’t examine if anti-Beta 1 integrin blocking antibody therapy could prevent tumor cells injected into the mouse bloodstream from producing micrometastases in the blood vessels of the brain rather than just looking at the growth of tumor cells injected directly into the brain, though I expect that those experiments are now being done and will soon be reported.  There will certainly be a lot of interest in this paper in the cancer research world, and scientists will seek to reproduce these results (a vital part of the scientific process) and then expand on them with their own studies of the safety and efficacy of this approach before clinical trials in humans can begin.

Regards

Paul Browne

1) Carbonell W.S. et al. “The vascular basement membrane as “soil” in brain metastasis.” PLoS ONE Volume 4(6):e5857 (2009) DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0005857

2) Park C.C. et al. “Beta1 integrin inhibitory antibody induces apoptosis of breast cancer cells, inhibits growth, and distinguishes malignant from normal phenotype in three dimensional cultures and in vivo.”Cancer Res. Volume 66(3), Pages 1526-1535 (2006) DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3071

APS members come out to support the Pro-Test Petition

Around a week ago we mentioned that the Society for Neuroscience had emailed all its members to support the Pro-Test Petition. Now the American Physiological Society (APS) has followed suit by emailing all its members.

Dear APS Colleague,

I join with the members of the American Physiological Society Council in urging you to add your voice to those of other scientists showing their support for humane animal research. Research advocates at Americans for Medical Progress, UCLA Pro-Test, and Speaking of Research have set up an online petition supporting humane animal research. Please consider adding your name, as we have, by going to http://www.raisingvoices.net/.

The Pro-Test Petition was inspired by a 2006 petition in the U.K. that gathered the signatures of over 20,000 people, including then Prime Minister Tony Blair. That petition helped to turn the tide of public opinion in the U.K. in favor of animal research. As a result, in 2008, supporters of research were able to celebrate the completion of a laboratory in Oxford whose construction had been halted for more than a year due to harassment and intimidation by animal rights extremists.

With violence against researchers escalating in the U.S., now is the time for members of the research community to publicly reaffirm the need for humane animal research. The APS has long been proud of the role it has played in promoting humane animal research and will continue to support such research in the future.

Thank you for considering this opportunity. If you decide to sign the petition, I hope that you will also forward it to interested colleagues, urging them to do the same.

Sincerely,

Gary C. Sieck, PhD
President

Hopefully the APS members will help give a boost the Pro-Test Petition which currently boasts over 8,000 signatures. Many thanks to the APS President, Gary C. Sieck, and we hope more organizations will follow suit.

Are you part of a bioscience organization? If so, email your president and urge them to follow the example of the Society for Neuroscience and email their members to inform them about this important petition.

Cheers

Tom

Speaking of Research layout changes

So I fiddled with the layout a bit – so you probably had to spend five minutes looking for this post (but you’ve found it!).

The committee decided it was worth trying a different layout in order to move focus away from the blog slightly. However what really matters is the opinion of the readers – so please feel free to leave a comment praising or castigating the new layout – we welcome all feedback however critical.

Cheers

Tom

The committee is revealed

I have thus far managed to get pictures and biographies from 9 10 members of the Speaking of Research committee – so check out the committee page. More people will be up in the next few days. The committee help write pieces on the blog (so David Bienus wrote a piece about animal welfare, David Jentsch wrote about his own research and Paul Browne has written most of our science posts) as well as help expand the website and suggest new ways of advocating for lifesaving research.

We always welcome new members to the committee – so if you’re interested in writing some blog pieces for us then read the “Joining the Committee” page.

Cheers
Tom

Over 3000 Society for Neuroscience members back animal research

The Society for Neuroscience (SfN) recently emailed its members urging them to sign the Pro-Test Petition (see our earlier posts).The result was over 3000 members signing their support in under 24 hours, bringing the total signatures to over 6,500!

SfN President, Thomas Carew, sent this to SfN members:

Dear SfN Members,

Consider adding your voice: www.raisingvoices.net

Learn about protecting research and researchers: Visit www.sfn.org/animals

On behalf of the entire Council of the Society for Neuroscience, I write to ask you to consider taking an important – and quick – opportunity to stand up and be counted in support of animal research. It will take less than a minute.

An online petition is circulating at www.raisingvoices.net . I urge you to read it, and consider adding your voice, as I have added mine. I also urge you to share this information with at least seven colleagues.

You already know that animal research is essential to scientific and medical progress. But many of our SfN colleagues have faced growing violence, intimidation, and threats for conducting vital, legal animal research. SfN is and will remain vocal in our support of researchers and this life-saving research. This petition offers another important opportunity to take action. Learn more about ways to help protect research and researchers.

Let me close by emphasizing that this issue directly affects each and every one of us in the Society, independent of the particular kind of science we personally practice. Thus we thank you for considering this important opportunity. SfN looks forward to continuing its advocacy on behalf of this crucial issue.

Sincerely,

Tom Carew

SfN President

Are you part of a bioscience organization? If so, email your president and urge them to follow the example of the Society for Neuroscience and email their members to inform them about this important petition.

www.raisingvoices.net

The Pro-Test Petition states that “We the undersigned believe:

  1. That animal research has contributed and continues to contribute to major advances in the length and quality of our lives.  It remains vital to understanding basic biological processes and for the development of new treatments and therapies such as antibiotics, vaccines, organ transplants, and cancer medicines.
  2. That animal research is morally justifiable provided animal welfare remains a high priority and no valid non-animal alternatives are available.
  3. That violence, intimidation and harassment of scientists and others involved in animal research is neither a legitimate means of protest, nor morally justified.”

So sign now, and remember to leave a positive comment!

They're Pro-Test, Are You?

They're Pro-Test, Are You?

Cheers

Tom Holder