Monthly Archives: July 2009

From Mouse to Monkey to Humans: The Story of Rituximab

Modern advances in science have meant that our models of diseases have vastly improved. Be that in a dish in the laboratory, a computer simulation or through using a transgenic mouse, there have been developments across the biomedical field that have given us a greater understanding of diseases and how our bodies work.

This increase in knowledge has meant that we are finding may drugs already on the market can treat a variety of diseases – those involving the same pathway or cell type. This is precisely what happened this month with a drug called Rituximab.

Rituximab was licensed in 1997 for use in the treatment of Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) – a cancer where cells of the immune system called B-cells mutate and divide abnormally. The cancer then spreads around the body when the B-cells clone themselves in replication.

Since it’s initial approval for use in NHL, rituximab has been used to successfully treat advanced rheumatoid arthritis and has also been part of anti-rejection treatments for kidney transplants (both involve B cells. Then news came last week that it could even slow the progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the early stages of the disease.

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rituximab is an interesting drug, as it is a chimeric antibody. This means that it contains portions of both human and mouse antibodies mixed together. The first papers reporting on rituximab were published in 1994. The first looked at its creation, and the second reported on the phase I clinical trials of the drug.

The human immune system works by using antibodies as their ‘messengers’. The antibodies contain multiple regions that allow them to work effectively. One part of the molecule binds with the foreign molecule; the other part then recruits the immune cells to destroy the molecule and eliminate it from the body.

The B-cells mutated in NHL and involved in RA are part of the human immune system and are responsible for making antibodies against ‘foreign invaders’. Mature forms of B-cells have a protein called CD20 on their surface.

The protein CD20 was the target for a team in San Diego (1) in 1994. Because NHL and RA are characterised by excessive levels of, or mutated B-cells, they looked at ways to reduce their numbers. The researchers determined that CD20 was the perfect target on the human B-cells as it was located on the surface of the cell and it didn’t mutate, move inside the cell or fall off in the life cycle of the B-cell. The team then produced an antibody that would attack CD20 itself, so it would bind to the outside of B-cells, flagging them to the immune system to be eliminated. They identified a mouse antibody that had high anti-CD20 activity.

They then constructed a “chimeric” antibody containing the variable domain of the mouse antibody, the portion that specifically binds CD20, along with the constant domain of human antibody, the portion that recruits other components of the immune system to the target.

The construction of a chimeric antibody (later named rituximab) was crucial, as the mouse antibody was unsuitable for direct use in humans. While the mouse antibody was able to bind to human CD20, it would not be able to then recruit the human complement system and immune cells that are needed destroy the “targeted” B cells. It would also quickly be recognised as foreign in the human body, and destroyed by the immune system, therefore by using a chimeric antibody with enough human characteristics, the antibody would not only recognise the human CD20 and target the immune system to it but would remain in the body long enough to destroy the B cells.

To test whether rituximab would work as hoped, they performed studies in cynomolgus monkeys. They choose this species because the constant domains of their antibodies are very similar to those in humans, unlike those of the mouse, allowing the chimeric antibody to function as it would in humans. Following administration of rituximab the number of B cells in the monkey’s bloodstream fell dramatically. The numbers were also reduced in the bone marrow (where B cells are produced) and the lymph nodes (where they are activated to target foreign molecules). Rituximab administration was non-toxic and in the weeks after treatment finished the number of B-cells slowly recovered. This is important as it demonstrates that the treatment didn’t harm the monkey’s bone marrow stem cells, an important consideration since these cells are required for a healthy immune system.

Rituximab was an ideal candidate to treat NHL and the promising results in monkeys prompted the scientists to conduct phase I clinical trials inhuman patients which confirmed that rituximab was safe and indicated that it could shrink tumors.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of rituximab involved many studies of patients with Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. While the initial clinical trial results varied, likely due to the differing sizes of tumors between the patients, they showed it was effective at reducing B-cell numbers and tumor size. Since it’s approval numerous clinical trials have confirmed that rituximab is an effective treatment for Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (3).

This month’s exciting study by Professor Paul-Peter Tak from the University of Amsterdam showed that rituximab in combination with the drug methotrexate could slow the progression of early stage rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

The study involved 755 patients diagnosed with RA within the last year. Methotrexate is already considered to be the best treatment for these patients and 12.5% of the patients taking only methotrexate in this study experienced significant reduction of their symptoms. However, compare this to the 30.5% of patients taking a combination of methotrexate and rituximab, and it is clear that rituximab is effective. Issues of cost have been raised in relation to rituximab, but if it turns out to be as effective in treating early RA as this study suggests, then it may ultimately save the health services and insurance companies money as slowing or stopping the progression of the disease will result in fewer patients needing the more expensive treatment and care required in advanced RA.

Emma Stokes

1) Reff M.E. et al. “Depletion of B cells in vivo by a chimeric mouse human monoclonal antibody to CD20.” Blood Volume 83(2), Pages 435-445 (1994) PubMed: 7506951

2) Maloney D.G. et al. “Phase I clinical trial using escalating single-dose infusion of chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (IDEC-C2B8) in patients with recurrent B-cell lymphoma.” Blood Volume 84(8), Pages 2457-2466 (1994) Pubmed: 7522629

3) Schultz H. et al. “Chemotherapy plus Rituximab versus chemotherapy alone for B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD003805. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD003805.pub2.

New York Times mentions role of animals in research

A recent New York Times article looked at a former banker, Mary Ann Baik, who left her job and retrained as an animal healthcare technician. Within this article another lab animal technician, Kevin Phelps, talked about his thoughts on his career – importantly he took care to mention the role of animal research in medicine.

Kevin I. Phelps, a senior lab animal technician at the SUNY Upstate Medical University research facility in Syracuse, focuses on minimizing the stress of the animals in his care.

“If they aren’t properly cared for and they get anxious,” he said, “their blood pressure goes up, their hormone levels change, and we end up with inaccurate test results.”

In a job that he says is different every day, Mr. Phelps has brought in toys to keep mice occupied and managed postoperative care for animals that had undergone new knee-replacement and kidney-transplant procedures.

Mr. Phelps also does public outreach to educate people about animal testing. “Animal research can be controversial,” he said, “but it’s a component of virtually every drug and medical advancement we have.”

Picture courtesy of New York Times

Picture courtesy of New York Times

It is this type of comment which helps to educate the public and reinforce the idea of the role of animals in medical research. Even articles that are not dealing with the animal testing controversy can be play a part in overall advocacy efforts in educating the public.

So good work to Kevin Phelps!

Best Regards

Tom

From Science Fiction to Science Fact

The ability to regrow limbs lost through accident or the action of their nemesis is a power usually thought of as belonging only to comic-book heroes, but in nature the ability to regenerate tissues and even whole limbs is surprisingly widespread across the plant and animal kingdoms. While in the womb mammals such as humans have a powerful ability to repair and regenerate tissues, but this ability has only been observed to a limited extent in young children, who partially grow back the tips of fingers that have been lost in accidents, and is rarely seen in adults. The ability of mammals, including humans, to repair damaged tissues is rather paltry* when compared to the ability of the axolotl, a species of salamander, which can regrow an entire limb if the limb is amputated anywhere between the shoulder and hand (1). Since the axolotl, an amphibian, shares much of the basic wound healing machinery with mammals scientists study it to gain a better understanding of how wound healing and tissue regeneration take place, and through understanding why wounds heal differently in mammals and they hope to develop new treatment that improve healing and decrease scarring in patients who have suffered serious injuries. Ultimately it is hoped that this knowledge will help scientists to engineer tissues and organs for transplant, and perhaps someday to replace limbs list in automobile accidents and conflict.

Axolotl
This week the science journal Nature reports that a team of scientists working in Dresden and Florida have made a significant discovery concerning the limb regeneration process in the axolotl (2). Very early in the regeneration process a clump of cells known as the blastema forms at the site of injury, and this clump of apparently identical cells gives rise to all parts of the regenerated limb such as cartilage, muscle, nerves and skin. Until now it has generally been assumed that the blastema is composed of uniform pluripotent cells that can develop into a wide range of tissues. To examine if this was indeed the case Martin Kragl and colleagues used transgenic technology to label specific tissues in the axolotl with Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP). They found that when they transplanted GFP-labeled cells from a particular tissue at the injury site they could watch these cells became blastema cells and later develop into new tissue in the regrown limb. The interesting finding was that cells could only produce cells of the original tissue type, muscle cells became blastema cells and then developed into new muscle, and nerve cells became blastema cells and then developed into new nerve tissue. The one exception was cells from a layer of skin known as the dermis, which contributed to both the dermal layer of the new skin and to new bone. This basic research discovery that the cells of the blastema are not in fact pluripotent despite taking on many of the characteristics of stem cells, and the implication that the blastema needs to include cells from a range of tissues for proper regeneration to occur, is of critical importance to scientists who are seeking to reproduce blastema conditions in mammals.

Meanwhile a technique that might once have seemed like science fiction, the use of high-energy ultrasound beams to heat and destroy tumors, has been in the news after a successful clinical trial for the treatment of prostate cancer in the UK. While the use of ultrasound in medicine is something most of us are familiar with, being frequently used to produce images of the developing fetus during pregnancy, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is less well known, despite being under development for more than fifty years. The earliest research on the use of HIFU was performed by ultrasound pioneer William Fry who used it to produce lesions deep in the brains of cats and monkeys (3), technique that was subsequently used in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Technological limitations however impeded the development of the technique, and it was not until the development of technologies such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) , used to identify the targets for the beams and monitor their destruction, that HIFU became a practical technique.

Reproduced from European Journal of Ultrasound 9, 19-29, 1999

Reproduced from European Journal of Ultrasound 9, 19-29, 1999

From the late 1970’s until the early 1990’s a series of experiments (3,4) in rodent models of cancer showed that HIFU could be used to safely kill tumor cells, and in the early 1990s studies undertaken by Dr. Albert Gelet and colleagues in Lyon and Prof. Francis J. Fry at the Indiana University Medical Center demonstrated that it was possible to precisely destroy small regions within the dog prostate without harming the surrounding tissue using a probe inserted in the rectum and guided by MRI (5,6). These studies led directly to successful clinical trials of this technique in humans, and to the introduction of a treatment that is now gaining acceptance as a safe and effective alternative to invasive surgery or radiation in the treatment of prostate cancer. Animal research was crucial to the development and evaluation of HIFU over the past decades and continues to play a key role in ongoing work to adapt HIFU to treat other types of cancer, including cancers of the kidney and liver.

* An exception to this rule is deer, which regularly regrow antlers containing skin, bone and blood vessels.

Regards

Paul Browne

1) Gurtner G.C. et al. “Wound repair and regeneration” Nature, Volume 453, Pages 314-321 (2008) DOI: 10.1038/nature07039
2) Kragl M. et al. “Cells keep a memory of their tissue origin during axolotl limb regeneration” Nature, Volume 460, Pages 60-65 (2009) DOI:10.1038/naure08152
3) Kennedy J.E. et al. “High intensity focused ultrasound: surgery of the future?” The British Journal of Radiology, Volume 76, Pages 590-599 (2003) DOI:10.1259/bjr/17150274
4) Acher P.L. “High-intensity focused ultrasound for treating prostate cancer” BJU International, Volume 99(1), Pages 28-32 (2007) DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06523.x
5) Gelet A. et al. “Prostatic tissue destruction by high-intensity focused ultrasound: experimentation on canine prostate” Journal of endourology, Volume 7(3), Pages 249-253 (1993) PubMed: 8358423
6) Foster R.S. “Production of prostatic lesions in canines using transrectally administered high-intensity focused ultrasound.” European urology, Volume 23(2), Pages 330-336 (1993) PubMed: 7683997

Promote Advocacy – Support a Hayre Fellow

In March 2008 I travelled to the US as the inaugural Michael D. Hayre Fellow in Public Outreach. Through this opportunity I founded Speaking of Research and worked to improve the public’s understanding in public outreach. This year the new Hayre Fellow(s) will be able to try their hand at making a difference both nationally and in their local region – but to do so they need your help.

Right now several ambitious, intelligent students are hoping to launch innovative and promising grassroots initiatives in support of animal research in medicine. Each is a candidate for AMP’s Michael D. Hayre Fellowship in Public Outreach … But not all of these candidates will get a chance to carry out their campaigns. Right now, we are only able to fund one Hayre Fellow.

Help support a Hayre Fellow.You can turn that around.  Between now and July 15, we must raise $15,000 to fund an additional Hayre Fellow for the 2009-2010 academic year.  That would double the reach and impact of the program.  But we can’t do it without YOU!

So click here to read more, and I urge anyone who is able to help fund the next batch of Hayre’s fellows.

Regards

Tom