Comments on: Activists try “Climate of Fear” approach! http://speakingofresearch.com/2009/10/14/activists-try-climate-of-fear-approach/ Improving understanding about Animal Research / Animal Testing Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:45:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Paul Browne http://speakingofresearch.com/2009/10/14/activists-try-climate-of-fear-approach/#comment-982 Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:28:55 +0000 http://speakingofresearch.com/?p=1131#comment-982 Jason, it’s people like you who deserve the thanks. Every signature is a message to Camille and her cohorts that we won’t be intimidated.

]]> By: Jack Demolay http://speakingofresearch.com/2009/10/14/activists-try-climate-of-fear-approach/#comment-981 Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:56:06 +0000 http://speakingofresearch.com/?p=1131#comment-981 Jason,

You do have to laugh at how Camille cuts-and-pastes the comments to make them seem worse. What a whack job.

]]> By: Jason Thibeault http://speakingofresearch.com/2009/10/14/activists-try-climate-of-fear-approach/#comment-980 Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:23:59 +0000 http://speakingofresearch.com/?p=1131#comment-980 Both of the simulposted blog posts explicitly make it clear that not only is torture and murder acceptable to “end the violence”, but that this “convenient list” is a list of people to check off not after being contacted but after having their contact info listed for the more violent factions within the ARA forces to harass or worse. Just look at the NiO one, with the “dishonorable mentions” section, for an example. For what other conceivable reason would full contact information be provided for those that rally in defense of the signatories on a petition?

Thanks for the support, by the way, folks!

]]> By: Will Beckertine http://speakingofresearch.com/2009/10/14/activists-try-climate-of-fear-approach/#comment-979 Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:11:42 +0000 http://speakingofresearch.com/?p=1131#comment-979 Doesn’t the original blog post that this post is responding to basically just ask people to write a letter about an issue that is important to them?

This post seems to be a bit of an overreaction.

]]>