<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Score one for dialogue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://speakingofresearch.com/2010/02/18/score-one-for-dialogue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://speakingofresearch.com/2010/02/18/score-one-for-dialogue/</link>
	<description>Improving understanding about Animal Research / Animal Testing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:45:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheryl</title>
		<link>http://speakingofresearch.com/2010/02/18/score-one-for-dialogue/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cheryl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speakingofresearch.com/?p=1356#comment-1361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, of course the Animal Welfare Act should cover all vertebrates. Glad there is some agreement on that. 

I don&#039;t understand why the anti-vivisectionists don&#039;t get a lot more exercised about the use of animals as food: a whole lot more animals are used as food than for research, and there are a wealth of alternatives to animal eating, unlike animal testing.  Historically, many if not most anti-vivisectionists have been meat-eaters and been partial to cute animals.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, of course the Animal Welfare Act should cover all vertebrates. Glad there is some agreement on that. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand why the anti-vivisectionists don&#8217;t get a lot more exercised about the use of animals as food: a whole lot more animals are used as food than for research, and there are a wealth of alternatives to animal eating, unlike animal testing.  Historically, many if not most anti-vivisectionists have been meat-eaters and been partial to cute animals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

