Skip to content

Speaking of Research

Improving understanding about Animal Research / Animal Testing

  • News
    • #FactCheckNeeded
    • 3Rs
    • All News
    • Animal Rights News
    • Campus Activism
    • Evergreen Post Series
    • Guest Post
    • Philosophy
    • Press Releases
    • Science News
    • SR in the Media
    • SR News
    • Statistics
  • About
    • About SR
    • Guiding Principles
    • History of SR
    • Committee
    • SR in the Media
    • Comments Policy
  • Facts
    • The Animal Model
    • Animal Welfare and the 3Rs
    • Medical Benefits
    • Animal Research Regulations
      • EU Animal Research Regulations
      • US Animal Research Regulations
      • UK Animal Research Regulations
    • Veterinary Benefits
    • FAQ about Animal Research
    • Animal Research Briefings
      • Animal Research in Canada
      • Animal Research in Germany
      • Animal Research in the UK
      • Animal Research in the US
    • Arguments For Animal Research
  • Statistics
    • Historical Statistics
    • Worldwide Statistics
    • Canadian Statistics
    • EU Statistics
    • French Statistics
    • German Statistics
    • Swiss Statistics
    • UK Statistics
    • US Statistics
  • Animal Rights?
    • Animal Rights Pseudoscience
    • Do “Alternatives” Exist?
    • Animal Rights Philosophy
    • Animal Rights Activists/Groups
    • Animal Rights Extremism
  • Get Involved
    • Animal Research Statements
    • Rapid Response Network
    • Pro-Test
      • Pro-Test in the UK
      • Pro-Test for Science (US)
      • Pro-Test Italia (Italy)
      • Pro-Test Deutschland (Germany)
    • On Your Campus
    • Join the committee
    • Write for Us
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Multimedia
    • Research Indexed by Species
    • Research Indexed by Disease
  • Contact

Two Years On: The Concordat on Openness on Animal Research

In May 2014, Understanding Animal Research brought seventy-two organizations together to sign the Concordat on Openness on Animal Research in the UK, committing signatories to improving their communication surrounding the animal research they (or their members) conduct or fund. Signatories undertaken to fulfill the Concordat’s four commitments:

  1. Concordat logoWe will be clear about when, how and why we use animals in research
  2. We will enhance our communications with the media and the public about our research using animals
  3. We will be proactive in providing opportunities for the public to find out about research using animals
  4. We will report on progress annually and share our experiences

One of the clearest demands is a subsection of Commitment 2, which states (in one very long sentence):

Within one year of signing up to the Concordat we will make a policy statement about the use of animals in research avaiable via our website, to provide clear information about the nature of our own involvement with animal research and its role in the wider context of our research aims, and, and link this to a central portal, publicly available on the Understanding Animal Research (UAR) website, or provide this information to UAR for inclusion in the portal.”

Speaking of Research has the most comprehensive list of these policy statements, including institutions from ten different countries. For some countries we have only a few statements, often because language barriers have prevented us finding them – and for other countries we have many – particularly the US and UK. We have also rated these statements according to the amount of information they provide (see grading details). Nearly every UK Concodat signature has got a statement (some pharmaceuticals with research bases in the UK are classed as “International” in our lists).

Cambridge University animal research

 

The University of Cambridge provides videos and other information on their website.

In late February we announced that we had reached 200 statements. We are now at over 240 statements, and the list continues to grow. Please check if your institution is on our list.

Below we should a table of the ratings in different countries. In some countries like Australia and Ireland there are only a few institutions which have statements, which are generally low rated. This is likely because there is no expectation among institutions to have such statements. On the other hand the US and UK have nearly 100 institutional statements each. The UK is particularly impressive given that the 96 institutions represent (plus more in the International column) represents most of the biomedical research institutions conducting animal research in the country.

Institutioinal Webpages

What does a top rated animal research web page look like? Check out the fantastic work the University of Edinburgh has done on its website.

If we compare the grading of websites in the UK compared with everywhere we find the UK provides more information on average.

Quality of animal research statements compared

We can see that the UK has a higher proportion of statements ranked with 2 or more ticks. Two ticks would tend to mean a high level of website information available about an institution’s animal research.

In our eyes the Concordat on Openness on Animal Research in the UK has had two main victories. Firstly, it has encouraged nearly every animal research institution in the UK to openly explain on their websites that they do animal research – this is true of no other country. Secondly, it has helped drive better information to be provided on these websites, with increasing numbers of universities putting up case studies, images, videos and statistics.

We congratulate the Concordat on Openness on Animals Research in the UK for supporting transparent discussion on this issue, and we wish it all the best as it enters its third year.

Speaking of Research

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted on May 13, 2016May 20, 2016 by EditorPosted in Campus Activism, News, Outreach NewsTagged animal research, animal testing, australia, Concordat on Openness, europe, public engagement, uk, USA.

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Debating Animal Research in Australia
Next Next post: Dr. Dettmer Goes to Washington, Part 3
My Tweets

Recent Posts

  • Words matter September 15, 2022
  • Scientists reject PETA’s blithe disregard for human rights September 7, 2022
  • #Evergreen: It’s Back to School Time – Time for Institutions to Step Up September 6, 2022
  • Alzheimer’s Research with Primates: Speaking of Research in The Conversation September 2, 2022
  • The study of animals and bio-inspired designs August 26, 2022
  • Context matters-2022 Gallup poll August 25, 2022
  • Part 2. A Better Life with HIV/AIDS: From the Biomedical Laboratory to Reality August 19, 2022
  • A Better Life with HIV/AIDS: From the Biomedical Laboratory to Reality August 18, 2022
  • Study revives cell function in the body of dead pigs  August 17, 2022
  • Why study whiskers in mice? Humans don’t have whiskers August 10, 2022
May 2016
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Apr   Jun »
  • RSS - Posts

Sign up to receive email notification of our latest articles!

Join 6,380 other subscribers
  • Follow Following
    • Speaking of Research
    • Join 934 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Speaking of Research
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: